From the King Of Blogging, Sean Conners. Various articles and op/ed's on just about anything from A to Z. Politics, religion, entertainment and whatever else seems interesting at the moment. Members and non-members alike are welcomed to participate in th
at least for Dennis Nifong
Published on January 25, 2007 By Sean Conners aka SConn1 In Current Events
Last spring, the nation supposedly was enlightened to a tragic course of events. A woman had been raped by 3 priveledged students at one of the south's premiere universities. And this time, justice would prevail. the students were quickly identified, indicted and imprisoned. Evidence, including DNA evidence was gathered that would prove these out of control rich-kids were guilty of raping this poor woman. The students were thrown off the team, thrown off campus. The rest of the team, who was considered "guilty by association" were disbanded as a team and the coach, who must have been aware that his team was full of rapists and degenerates, was fired on the spot.

The only problem was, it was all a hoax perpetrated by a delusional woman with a history of mental illness that required treatment. Early evidence suggested this. Security photographs and receipts even put at least 1 of the 3 alleged rapists miles from the scene of the crime. It became clear early on that the photo line-ups were done outside the rules of such procedures when it was learned that only players were in the line up. No persons were inserted into the test who were not players ensuring no matter who she identified, these bad lacrosse players were going down.

Dennis Nifong, the DA in the case, vigorously pursued the case, supposedly. That vigor got an unpopular DA re-elected. And from what the newly elected DA was telling us, justice for the woman and the players would soon follow. His office told the public to ignore all the rumours surrounding the case. Ignore the alleged evidence the "media" was putting out that cleared the players. We were told to believe him and his evidence that the players were 100% guilty.

In the last couple of weeks, we have finally seen jusice's wheels begin to turn. But not how Mr Nifong intended. The wheels of justice are rightfully in a direction to run over him, and his lies. Lies that got him re-elected, legitimized the ramblings of a nut-job and permantly tarnished the lives and reputations of at least 3 students and lacrosse players. Lies that meant a coach was out of a job because a nutjob spewed her ramblings into (indirectly, it turns out) the ears of a crooked DA that wanted to save his own job. Lies that ended a season for an entire team. A season that will never be recovered. Lies that caused a wealth of damage, most of which cannot be undone.

But what can be done began to be done when Nifong was charged with new and much more serious ethics charges than were previously charged to Nifong. The charges now include Nifong’s decision to use a private lab for DNA testing as his office investigated allegations three men raped the woman at a team party last March.

Those tests uncovered genetic material from several men on the woman’s underwear and body, but none from any lacrosse player. The bar complaint alleges that those results were not released to the defense and that Nifong repeatedly said in court he had turned over all evidence that could benefit the defense.

“If these allegations are true and if they don’t justify disbarment, then I’m not sure what does,” said Joseph Kennedy, a law professor at the University of North Carolina. “It’s hard for me to imagine a more serious set of allegations against a prosecutor.”

The bar previously charged Nifong with making misleading and prejudicial comments about the athletes under suspicion.

Nifong is a disgrace, in my opinion. He has used his office in ways that are not only unethical and deserve his disbarrment, but also criminal. It appears the only "crime" the 3 students, or any of the students were guilty of were that of allowing some underage drinking, which is common on virtually all campuses and for being wealthy and white. They made the perfect target for Nifong's case and campaign.

Maybe now that Nifong is being exposed, people will re-examine their willingness to convict before actually knowing anything. Maybe people will think twice before applying age old stereotypes to damn certain indivduals and use allegations as "proof" that these stereotypes are indeed true.

Probably not. But if justice does actually come to Dennis Nifong's doorstep and he is at least disbarred for violating just about every ethic that is supposed to be part of his job, then it's a start.







Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 25, 2007
I was "asked to leave" a college by a coach who had drank enough beer with his players that they had stacked the cans to cover an entire dorm room wall. One of the list of heinous sins I was accused of was a bag of empties in my closet. If you haven't had to live in a dorm where the head resident was a coach and all the RAs were players, well, you don't know how bad it can be.


i did,,,i moved off campus at the earliest opportunity

First, my memory failed -- because the coach wasn't fired. He resigned


which coach? you lost me there shade...

on Jan 25, 2007
which coach? you lost me there shade


the duke lacrosse coach.


If you google duke lacrosse coach party you will get a series of stories about his resignation.
on Jan 25, 2007
the duke lacrosse coach.


did he resign,,, or was he forced to resign, or be fired? what do you think?

and not everyone says that this lacrosse team was out of control. here's another side...

Another picture that emerges from the New Yorker article is how unfairly President Brodhead treated Coach Pressler. And you get the feeling that Brodhead now regrets his abrupt firing of the coach, who, it turns out was a very dedicated coach spending a lot of time with his players and exerting a positive influence on them. But Brodhead gave in to the pressure and the bad publicity and fired him without waiting for an investigation of the team and the coach's leadership, an investigation that came back praising the team's behavior.
The committee examining the lacrosse culture found no evidence that team members were racist or sexist. The players were regarded by their professors, ten of whom were surveyed, to be “academically responsible students.” (The lone dissenter was Peter Wood.) The committee’s principal findings might have been crafted by the lacrosse booster club. “By all accounts, the lacrosse players are a cohesive, hard working, disciplined, and respectful athletic team,” the report said. “Their behavior on trips is described as exemplary. Players clean the team bus before disembarking. Airline personnel have complimented them for their behavior. They observe curfews. They obey the team’s no alcohol rule before games. They are respectful of people who serve the team, including bus drivers, airline personnel, trainers, the equipment manager, the team manager, and the groundskeeper. Finally, the lacrosse program has a 100% graduation rate.” As for the team’s inclination toward alcohol abuse, the report noted that, in this, the lacrosse players differed little from other Duke students.

The report also showed that Coach Pressler disciplined the team whenever he was informed of misbehavior, and had suspended two players during the 2005 N.C.A.A. tournament for having violated team discipline. The university had plainly acted precipitately in firing Pressler, and Brodhead took pains to speak favorably of him whenever his name came up. (Pressler has taken a coaching job at Bryant University, in Rhode Island, a Division II school.)
on Jan 25, 2007
Good riddance, I say.


Yes, Railroads R us are always good. regardless of the culpablity of the railroadee. That is beside the point to finding scapegoats.

maybe we can find a patsy for any team we dont like, have them yell rape and then get a coach fired. Damn! But then they will do that to our favorite teams as well.

Oh well, another great plan that wont work. Or will it?
on Jan 25, 2007
Dr. Guy--did you read my comment, because I very specifically addressed that I think he should be fired for failing to do the job he was hired for, not because of the allegations against the kids. My understanding of the situation is that he was fully aware of what was going on, this wasn't the first time that the team had an off campus party involving a stripper, and the coach was more concerned with remaining "cool" than acting like the authority figure he should have. Personally, if I had kids, this isn't the type of mentor that I'd want for them.

Besides, he wasn't fired. He resigned (and S.Conn, no I don't think we will never really know if he did so willingly or not).
on Jan 25, 2007
I have to be honest and say that I don't think the school should have a DAMN thing to do with ANYTHING that happens off campus. The Methodist school I went to decided about halfway through that they'd start investigating reports about "unseemly" behavior that occurred in the bars 50 miles away in a larger city. All it did was give people with petty grudges something to trump up gossip about their arch enemies.

It's no different than elementary and high school kids getting in trouble for what they do on MySpace from home. I don't believe that the school system, or a university, has any authority outside what happens on their own campus.
on Jan 26, 2007
I have to be honest and say that I don't think the school should have a DAMN thing to do with ANYTHING that happens off campus


the exception to that i would add is those who are under scholarship and have certain "morals clauses" in their scholarships. but i don't believe any of these players were subject to that.
on Jan 26, 2007
Sean -

I disagree with you on many things, but not this. You are dead on here. Good article.
on Jan 26, 2007
thaks daiwa...it's always nice to find common ground
on Jan 27, 2007
"thaks daiwa...it's always nice to find common ground"


NO IT ISN'T!!!
2 Pages1 2