From the King Of Blogging, Sean Conners. Various articles and op/ed's on just about anything from A to Z. Politics, religion, entertainment and whatever else seems interesting at the moment. Members and non-members alike are welcomed to participate in th
at least for Dennis Nifong
Published on January 25, 2007 By Sean Conners aka SConn1 In Current Events
Last spring, the nation supposedly was enlightened to a tragic course of events. A woman had been raped by 3 priveledged students at one of the south's premiere universities. And this time, justice would prevail. the students were quickly identified, indicted and imprisoned. Evidence, including DNA evidence was gathered that would prove these out of control rich-kids were guilty of raping this poor woman. The students were thrown off the team, thrown off campus. The rest of the team, who was considered "guilty by association" were disbanded as a team and the coach, who must have been aware that his team was full of rapists and degenerates, was fired on the spot.

The only problem was, it was all a hoax perpetrated by a delusional woman with a history of mental illness that required treatment. Early evidence suggested this. Security photographs and receipts even put at least 1 of the 3 alleged rapists miles from the scene of the crime. It became clear early on that the photo line-ups were done outside the rules of such procedures when it was learned that only players were in the line up. No persons were inserted into the test who were not players ensuring no matter who she identified, these bad lacrosse players were going down.

Dennis Nifong, the DA in the case, vigorously pursued the case, supposedly. That vigor got an unpopular DA re-elected. And from what the newly elected DA was telling us, justice for the woman and the players would soon follow. His office told the public to ignore all the rumours surrounding the case. Ignore the alleged evidence the "media" was putting out that cleared the players. We were told to believe him and his evidence that the players were 100% guilty.

In the last couple of weeks, we have finally seen jusice's wheels begin to turn. But not how Mr Nifong intended. The wheels of justice are rightfully in a direction to run over him, and his lies. Lies that got him re-elected, legitimized the ramblings of a nut-job and permantly tarnished the lives and reputations of at least 3 students and lacrosse players. Lies that meant a coach was out of a job because a nutjob spewed her ramblings into (indirectly, it turns out) the ears of a crooked DA that wanted to save his own job. Lies that ended a season for an entire team. A season that will never be recovered. Lies that caused a wealth of damage, most of which cannot be undone.

But what can be done began to be done when Nifong was charged with new and much more serious ethics charges than were previously charged to Nifong. The charges now include Nifong’s decision to use a private lab for DNA testing as his office investigated allegations three men raped the woman at a team party last March.

Those tests uncovered genetic material from several men on the woman’s underwear and body, but none from any lacrosse player. The bar complaint alleges that those results were not released to the defense and that Nifong repeatedly said in court he had turned over all evidence that could benefit the defense.

“If these allegations are true and if they don’t justify disbarment, then I’m not sure what does,” said Joseph Kennedy, a law professor at the University of North Carolina. “It’s hard for me to imagine a more serious set of allegations against a prosecutor.”

The bar previously charged Nifong with making misleading and prejudicial comments about the athletes under suspicion.

Nifong is a disgrace, in my opinion. He has used his office in ways that are not only unethical and deserve his disbarrment, but also criminal. It appears the only "crime" the 3 students, or any of the students were guilty of were that of allowing some underage drinking, which is common on virtually all campuses and for being wealthy and white. They made the perfect target for Nifong's case and campaign.

Maybe now that Nifong is being exposed, people will re-examine their willingness to convict before actually knowing anything. Maybe people will think twice before applying age old stereotypes to damn certain indivduals and use allegations as "proof" that these stereotypes are indeed true.

Probably not. But if justice does actually come to Dennis Nifong's doorstep and he is at least disbarred for violating just about every ethic that is supposed to be part of his job, then it's a start.







Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 25, 2007
I'm still wondering why Nifong went so far out on a limb about this. A lot has been made about these newest revelations, but by the time this case was a month or two old it was blatantly obvious that something was really, really wrong. I mean, once the election was over and it was obvious that this was bogus, why did he so stubbornly keep at it?

I can see it from the angle of trying to stem minority outrage during an election. I don't agree with it, but I can at least understand it. From the election on he appears to me to be just as deranged as the woman in question.
on Jan 25, 2007

I'm still wondering why Nifong went so far out on a limb about this.

 

IIR wasn't he trailing politically there when this case hit? I am operating just from memory here but I seem to recall this being a pull-from-behind sort of publicity thing...? I could be wrong though.

on Jan 25, 2007
And still it continues as at least one professor has resigned in protest that the students are not going to go to jail, and 88 signed a letter condemning the students on no evidence but the conflicted testimony of a deranged woman.

It goes far beyond the illegal and unethical conduct of Nifong. It shows that racism is very much alive and well on College Campuses and it is being perpetutated by the College elitist against anyone who is pale or has well to do parents.
on Jan 25, 2007
If the original allegation is proven to be false, the woman should be charged also.
on Jan 25, 2007
"IIR wasn't he trailing politically there when this case hit? I am operating just from memory here but I seem to recall this being a pull-from-behind sort of publicity thing...? I could be wrong though."


Yeah, but not the same election shedule as the big one. He won that election back at the beginning of May, 2006. Even if you can bear the idea he ignored the early warning signs because of the election, it's still going on a year with more and more heinous revelations coming out on a monthly and sometimes weekly basis.

So... why? I really don't get it.

"And still it continues as at least one professor has resigned in protest that the students are not going to go to jail, and 88 signed a letter condemning the students on no evidence but the conflicted testimony of a deranged woman."


The professor only resigned from a committee on race relations. It was because they've invited two of the boys back. It wouldn't make much sense to resign from the school because of them not going to jail, since Duke isn't really responsible for that.

The 88 were no different than Al "diamond merchants" Sharpton's Tawana Brawley scandal. They praised people who harassed the players, openly called them 'rapists', and now that they're found to be idiots they've removed their webpage and they are going to act like it didn't happen.

Duke should fire every single one of them. Period.
on Jan 25, 2007
Duke should fire every single one of them. Period.


My misinformation on the resignation. I heard she resigned. But Duke already has one lawsuit on this where a visiting professor gave a failing grade to one of the team members just because he was on the team.

But the biggest loser in all of this? Duke. They tossed those kids under the bus. How many people are going to look at that, and say "no way for my children"?
on Jan 25, 2007
Admissions down 3% this year. Whether that is because of the mess or not is debatable, but I wouldn't send my kid to a school that punished the whole team based upon unfounded accusations, and allowed professors to create a vigilante movement against them, complete with people banging pots and pans and yelling meanness outside their residence.

The saddest part is that if this was the basketball team none of this would have happened. NIFONG wouldn't have pursued it. The Basketball team is worth millions a year to Duke, and the lacrosse team loses them money, no doubt. Duke would have gone to bat for their basketball team, even without all the exculpatory revelations.

If it had been a black basketball player and a white stripper, there would have been no "group of 88", no protesters baning on pots and pans, and the season would damn well definitely not have been canceled. That's the truth of MAINSTREAM 21st century racism in the US. We only marginalize the racists that don't make us money.

on Jan 25, 2007
A lot has been made about these newest revelations, but by the time this case was a month or two old it was blatantly obvious that something was really, really wrong. I mean, once the election was over and it was obvious that this was bogus, why did he so stubbornly keep at it?


it's only my opinion...but i think nifong figured the press would die down and he would eventually quietly dismiss the charges...he was wrong. just like he was wrong about just about everything from the beginning.

It goes far beyond the illegal and unethical conduct of Nifong. It shows that racism is very much alive and well on College Campuses and it is being perpetutated by the College elitist against anyone who is pale or has well to do parents.


i wouldn't call that racism, per se...more like class warfare and the stereotypes that go with being the son of parents who have a few bucks in the bank or any kind of advantage. i think if this would have been the primarily black duke basketball team, where the majority of the team enjoys the priveledge of athletic scholarships, the reaction would have been similiar. it may not have had all the black ministers in the south rallying, but sim. voices would have come forward and "demanded justice" for the poor lil girl who could not have possibly lied.

If the original allegation is proven to be false, the woman should be charged also.


maybe,,,but i think she would probably have a strong mental defect defense and eventually get off. nifong is the one who used this derranged girl for his advantage and to hell with anyone else attitude.

Duke should fire every single one of them. Period.


i'm not sure if that's the answer either. everyone except nifong was the victim of propoganda being laid out for them by the DA office. the spinelessness of the duke administration not standing behind their players and students was shameful tho. they threw those kids in the fire and abandoned them out of a selfish desire to look like they were "pro-active" and righteous. turns out they were reactonary and had no actual faith in their students, whom, when accepting them, deemed them to be moral enough to be part of the duke family.

it's sad and scary to think that any of us could have been the victim just like them. that our affiliated organizations would simply throw us under the bus to save their own neck. and that unreversable slander could happen just on the ramblings of a mental patient.





on Jan 25, 2007
and the coach, who must have been aware that his team was full of rapists and degenerates, was fired on the spot.


While I agree that what happened to the kids was grossly unfair and that Nifong should be disbarred -- I still believe that the coach should have been fired. Not because his team was made up of rapists -- but because (from what I've read and if I remember correctly from the statement Duke made when he was terminated) he was well aware of the underage drinking and partying and did nothing to stop it. This wasn't a one-off party, but a regular happening. His job as a coach was to ensure the well being of his athletes and turning a blind eye to blatant disrespect for the law isn't the type of coach that any university wants.
on Jan 25, 2007
Yes, but as professors they should know how our system of justice works. The 88 not only bypassed the assumption of innocence, but published their approval of the vigilante-style harassment of what they called "rapists". Come on, that's not behavior that should be allowed in ANY place that associates itself with "higher education".

In the end, they showed a dedication more to their biases and hatred than their students. For that, and the fact they supported the harrassment of people who had yet to be proven guilty, they should be fired. There's the door, bye.

The fact that we can brush that kind of behavior off just creates more of it. If it were 88 against black students, what they applauded would have been likened to a lynching, wouldn't it?
on Jan 25, 2007
wouldn't call that racism, per se...more like class warfare and the stereotypes that go with being the son of parents who have a few bucks in the bank or any kind of advantage.


Read Baker's response. Condemning someone based upon their race is racism. And the only reason these "clowns" of academia jumped on the railroad bandwagon was because the accused were caucasians.
on Jan 25, 2007
I still believe that the coach should have been fired. Not because his team was made up of rapists -- but because (from what I've read and if I remember correctly from the statement Duke made when he was terminated) he was well aware of the underage drinking and partying and did nothing to stop it. This wasn't a one-off party, but a regular happening.


yeah, and that's soooo unusual on college teams. if he were the basketball coach, or one that "brought in money" to the university instead of the coach of a minor sport that doesn't make money, do ya think he would have been fired? i've been to plenty of parties with underage football /basketball players for penn state, university of pittsburgh and many others...i used to sell the ohio university players their "party supplies" on a regular basis back in the day.

and plenty of scandals followed many pitt football / basketball players around. i never saw 1 coach be fired for the actions of the players under his alleged "control." and many players were actually convicted of crimes unlike here. do ya think anyone would have the balls to fire joepa? not in this lifetime.

that coach was a scapegoat for something that happens every day on almost every campus in america.
on Jan 25, 2007
Yes, but as professors they should know how our system of justice works. The 88 not only bypassed the assumption of innocence, but published their approval of the vigilante-style harassment of what they called "rapists". Come on, that's not behavior that should be allowed in ANY place that associates itself with "higher education".


here, i agree with you. they should have known better. i'm just not content to just blame it all on race. were some motivated by that? for sure. i'm just not gonna blanket them with a stereotype the same as the students shouldn't have been. i think economic class had as much to do with it as race.
on Jan 25, 2007
I was "asked to leave" a college by a coach who had drank enough beer with his players that they had stacked the cans to cover an entire dorm room wall. One of the list of heinous sins I was accused of was a bag of empties in my closet. If you haven't had to live in a dorm where the head resident was a coach and all the RAs were players, well, you don't know how bad it can be.
on Jan 25, 2007
First, my memory failed -- because the coach wasn't fired. He resigned.

Just because big money sports get away with it, doesn't mean it's right.

Good riddance, I say.

2 Pages1 2