From the King Of Blogging, Sean Conners. Various articles and op/ed's on just about anything from A to Z. Politics, religion, entertainment and whatever else seems interesting at the moment. Members and non-members alike are welcomed to participate in th
Of course, all the usual caveats apply...

"It's way too early to make firm predictions."

"Dramatic changes in events could reshape things."

"Most Of These People Haven't Officially Announced"

And all that. But just for laughs, I want to give some thoughts on some early contenders and what may happen come 2008. First, a look at the GOP side of the fence.

John McCain- the aging Senator seems to have slipped from his early front runner status. That's in due, part, to his pro-Iraq stance and has outflanked even the President in his aggressiveness. That will win over the remaining hawks come 2008, but other conservative voters, who still "just don't like him" will be hoping for someone else to fill the republican ticket's shoes. By 2008, McCain's age might play a factor, but with medicine and science today, who knows...

Rudy Giulliani- "America's Mayor" will surely make a run, at least it looks like he will. His poll numbers have been strong, and seems to have won support beyond just the moderates of the party. Some social conservatives will have a hard time with his marital track record and stnces on some key social issues. But Rudy will be able to point to his cleaning up of Times Square and tough law enforcement record, in addition to his post 9/11 leadership to counter some of the flack. Rudy will surely have an easier time winning votes in the General election, as will McCain, but if I had to bet, I would say Rudy would win out over McCain in a head to head in some of the "Rubier red" states and thir primaries. Although a lot of "nose holding" would probably take place. And unfortunately, in most of those states, there will be other choices.

Sam Brownback- Will certainly champion the Christian right. How far outside of that base he will be able to win over is anybody's guess. In a recent "joint conference" setting on AIDS recently with the "Purpose Driven Life" flock, Brownback got zinged by Senator Barack Obama when trying to take Republican or Conservative "ownership" of God's house. Obama reminded Brownback that it is his house too. But hey, George Bush did pretty well in 2000 by building from the Christian right out. And before him, the far right wing pator, Pat Robinson showed pretty well in earlier primary races.

Duncan Hunter- The California Congressman announced his intention to run a couple a months ago with little fanfare. But I think this guy could be a darkhorse. He is big on immigration security and I think will be popular with the Christian base of the GOP. From there, if he gets his message out, in amongst all the dollars being spent by his competitors, he could gain enough steam to stay around long enough to catch enough attention of enough donors to be a serious contender. I think the congressman knows what he's up against, and I would not discount his candidacy. And if he makes the general election, his strong opposition to NAFTA and such should make him popular with labor groups.

Mitt Romney- The conservative Mormon from Massechucetts. In the end, that may be too much for too many people to swallow. I can't see serious evangelicals voting for someone of the Mormon faith, too many religious differences in the end. he doesn't seem to be a leader on anything republicans hold dear and his positions have sometimes waffled. Something he won't be able to survive if the GOP attack machine turns on him in the primary.


Of course others could pop in the race. People like Jeb Bush or Condi Rice and other names have been touted. We could be knee deep in Iraq by then, or out, or on our way out. The economy could turn up, down or sideways. I expect border security to be less of an issue by 2008, as I see some sort of bill on the horizon with the democrats. There will be objections on whatever is passed, but it will probably not be from the mainstream. But again, who knows what the republicans will be demanding from their nominee in 2008.

Now let's look at the Democratic side, which may be a little more wide open than we think.

Hillary Clinton- The early front runner hasn't announced, but everyone, well, almost everyone expects her to eventually announce her intention to run. She would be the 1st female President. Something I think will be more of a factor for her than anyone would really care to admit in this day and age. But few are arguing her credentials and even those who don't like her, seem to respect her political prowess and skill. Not to mention, having a most popular ex president as your husband cheerleading for you throughout the campaign will be a new force to be reckoned with. Bill Clinton could have a major impact on squashing her opponents, especially in the primaries. Expect her to run. Expect a strong campaign. But don't expect her to just walk away with it. Throughout the debates that will happen before New Hampshire, Iowa, et al... expect teh phrase "this is a primary, not a coronation" to be used and similair lines to be used. And democrats seem to like a darkhorse, their front runners have been known to fade.

Barack Obama- I must admit here, I got his "Audacity Of Hope" for xmas, and am just about finished with it. It is a good book. A little wordy at times, but overall, a really good read. And if he runs, he will be dangerous. Anyone who saw his keynote speech in 2004 knows he is one of those speakers who just "have it." Reagan had it, King jr. Had it, Clinton had it, Kennedy had it and Barak has it. Will that lead him to the White House? Probably not. But Obama has some great ideas and I think the way he thinks is really going to apeal to a lot of people. He may not even run, but if he does, he will be dangerous.

John Edwards- Officiall threw his hat in the Presidential ring this week in New Orleans, where he was doing work on his antoi poverty campaign. I like John Edwards. And it wouldn't bug me to see him as President. I think he's somewhat honest and good hearted. He wouldn't be my first choice, and I get the feeling he wouldn't be most othre's 1st choice. Butif Hillary stubles, and Barack stays out, he could be the one standing in the end.

Joe Biden- Joe has made some moves, without "officially" throwing his hat in the ring. Depending on our Iraq situation, he could be more formidable than early polls would suggest. He's a guy who could use the debates to his advantage. Biden knows how to get a point across. And where some may see his "Dupontesque" pomposness getting in the way, he could be the right mix of experience and integrity the democrats are looking for. Until poeple start picking on his lying about his class rank in law school the last time around in addition to pretty much plagarizing JFK's words in a speech. Then there is his "Macaca" moment when he made a crack about Indian people and Duncan Donuts. Expect Joe to maybe be a cabinet member or Secretary Of State should whomever wins the nomination wins the election. Rest assured, it won' t be Biden being sworn in come Jan. 2008. Unless maybe it's for vice-president.

Dennis Kucinich- The bachelor congressman from Ohio will once again be touting his refusal to sign on to George Bush's Iraq plan and his big time pro-american labor and enviromental stances. Issues that will matter to democratic voters. Unfortunately for Dennis, sometimes it's not the message, but the messenger. Kucinich is just not the right messenger. Not only is he harsh and brash to both the ears and eyes, but I think he kind of scares many democrats when they look at him and he looks like Mike Dukakis's nephew. If Obama runs, this candidacy is dead on the shores of Lake Erie. Obama will immediately take most of his support away on issues like the war in Iraq and labor. And Obama is just the more "TV friendly" face to deliver those messages.

Then the democrats too have other names being flung about. But Tom Vilsack can't even be the most popular guy in his home state of Iowa. John Kerry will never win the nomination again. Bill Richardson could be a serious contender if he ever gets off his duff and starts advertising. And if Al Sharpton runs again, he will probably once again be an entertaining sideshow of soundbytes and mis-spent money. Other names could emerge, but don't expect Howard dean to break his pledge where he traded party leadership for a 2008 run. And from the political capital Dean gained in leading the party to it's 1st big win in a long time, he won't need to.

I wanted to get these thoughts out of the way early. Now I can go back to writing about some other stuff As the 1st serious debates won't be happening until late next year.





Comments
on Dec 28, 2006
really quickly cuz i'm outrageously late (even for me).

no republican is gonna get the nomination--much less the necessary support--without first being annointed by the prophets at lynchburg. despite his recent willingness to kneel out in the snow there to demonstrate just how far he's willing to compromise his integrity, that leaves mccain out. i'm not sure giuliani can make the cut either (remember he moved his mistress into gracie mansion and was lookin pretty sleazy for a while; no wonder he was smote by prostate cancer). i'm not writing off romney either altho you make a good point. brownback seems the most likely of those you mention.

duncan hunter is a spotlight-seaking idiot with a few bucks--in other words, he's got the right 'dumb sitcom daddy' stuff. dunno how he and the princes of god will get along but...he could be a contender.

as far as the democrats go, i'll defer to mr zimmerman:

"come writers and critics
who prophesize with your pen
and keep your eyes wide
the chance won't come again
and don't speak too soon
for the wheel's still in spin
and there's no tellin' who
that it's namin'."


with that in mind, i'm puzzled as to why you didn't include al gore.
on Dec 28, 2006
with that in mind, i'm puzzled as to why you didn't include al gore.

an oversight...if gore runs, he will be a serious contender,,,i'm just not convinced he will run tho.
on Jan 09, 2007
correction...biden was accused of plagarizing a british politician, not JFK in 1987. and afterwards, was shown to have credited the man for those words.
on Jan 10, 2007
Good article, sean. Any interest in speculating on third party front runners?

The two names that I see being most likely for the LP nomination are Michael Badnarik and Bob Barr. If Barr doesn't go after the presidential nomination, I'm hoping he could be coaxed into the veep role as he could bring a lot to the ticket.

Incidentally, the LP national convention will be about a six hour drive from me, so plans at this time are to attend.
on Jan 10, 2007
Let me throw out an early darkhorse Democratic veep candidate and see what you think: Wisconsin senator Russ Feingold. Feingold has the distinction of not having waffled on the war or the US Patriot Act, and he's about as close to bulletproof a candidate as the Democrats can muster. I don't know if you've ever heard Feingold speak, but he has a Kennedyesque charm to him and should be able to appeal to a lot of the younger voters. He's a not quite ready for prime time player in the Presidential race, but I think he'd fit nicely as a VP candidate.
on Jan 10, 2007
i like bob barr. i would seriously consider him, i think,,,at least on the broad strokes and all,,,he might have enough political muscle to get into the debates too.

whereas i believe the last presidential election was a time to put 3rd parties aside, this one might need some 3rd party or even 4th party spunk. if, for nothing else, it's time people stop this overly simplistic "either / or " thought process that everything seems to get broken down to these days. i think our country needs to "evolve" a little (hope that doesn't offend christians, lol) and realize that solutions need to be approached from multiple angles, and not everything is black and white.

on Russ...I like Russ Feingold. I can't say i agree with everything the guy has said or done, but i think he stands with much integrity and is one of the "good guys" regardless of politics. his achillies heel isn't anything to do with the war, and people can't criticze him in relation to bill clinton as he was a leader in the hearings and all,,,,but mccain-feingold has become almost a 4 letter word with many who are politically active. but i like him, and was a little dissapointed when he announced that he wasn't running.

also,,,i'm reconsidering Biden as a potential contender. if he can actually keep his mouth shut a little on these hearings,,,,he may come off as the right guy at the right time with enough experience. his having a kid serving will give him a lot of credibility with military families and supporters. he has been pretty conservative socially. but then there's that crack about indians in the dunkin donuts....i dunno....



on Jan 14, 2007
Sean,

Have you heard that Ron Paul has announced as a GOP candidate? I think this throws a monkey wrench in the works. I believe that Ron Paul's longtime friendship with the Libertarian Party will make him a serious player in the '08 race. I have already pledged my support to Paul's campaign, as I believe he can do much to restore the GOP's credibility.

Even if Paul isn't selected as the party's Presidential candidate, I think the GOP would be foolish not to consider offering him the veep nod. His potential to bring in Libertarians is FAR too valuable to ignore, I believe.
on Jan 16, 2007
Have you heard that Ron Paul has announced as a GOP candidate?


no i haven't, but i like ron paul. good guy. i'm not an expert on him, but what i've seen and read, i like.

he would be a proverbial monkey wrench in the primary if he gets any press at all.