From the King Of Blogging, Sean Conners. Various articles and op/ed's on just about anything from A to Z. Politics, religion, entertainment and whatever else seems interesting at the moment. Members and non-members alike are welcomed to participate in th
GOP, Corker, show racist stripes
Published on October 24, 2006 By Sean Conners aka SConn1 In US Domestic
Harold Ford is running ofr Senator in Tennesee. The culturally conservative democrat has ran, by modern standards, a pretty good campaign. The same can't be said for his republican opponent or his party.

Bob Corker has allowed the RNC to run highly inflamatory racist ads in Tennesee. Corker claims to distance himself from the ads, which show white women suggesting Ford "call them" to have some fun. The old black man, white woman thing. Another ad, attacks Ford's father as being just another black criminal. That despite the fact that his father was aquitted of any wrong doing. That ad mentions the word "black" at least 6 times in 24 seconds and suggests that Ford only cares about African American issues.

The southern strategy still lives. Racism still dominates southern politics. It's a disgrace.

Corker has claimed that he feels the ads are "over the top" but despite this weak objection, the ads still run on his behalf. Corker should be ashamed of himself. Instead, what we'll probably get is more legalisms and carefully worded denials.

Corker is responible for these ads, a they are being run for him. He should put a stop to them if he really feels the way he feels. But he won't. Because for him, like the GOP, it's all about holding absolute power.

UPDATE: the ad was pulled yesterday after a wave of protest. ken mehlman claimed he couldn't pull the ad despite the fact that the ad clearly states and says that "the RNC is responsible for the content of this ad."

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 27, 2006
But in the 60's they were still democrats and "still" doing all sort of ugly things.

in the 50's and 60's they were dixiecrats, and eventually joined republicans

Your incorrect here also. The "skinheads" which are the angry young white guys you talk about, didn't start till the 80's and 90's.

no, in 1866, after the civil war ended. i am absolutely correct here.

btw, if there is anyone in maryland here, does it make you sick too every time you have to drive on the "Pulaski Highway?"
on Oct 27, 2006
no, in 1866, after the civil war ended. i am absolutely correct here.


You're kind of wrong. Especially since the klan as we know it today din't start until 1915! So my point stands. The "skinheads" which are the angry young white guys you talk about, didn't start till the 80's and 90's. Mainly because you are trying to talk about the 50's & 60's.


Link
on Oct 27, 2006
You're kind of wrong. Especially since the klan as we know it today din't start until 1915! So my point stands


no, because the quote i used came from a history of the klan, discussing it's origins, which were orig. in 1866. if ya wanna make the point that the skinheads have sim motivations for their hate, fine, i agree with you there. but i was talking about the origins of the origonal klan. if you didn't follow that, i can understand that.

brad contended that the klan originated with democrats, and that is pretty accurate. the stuff about the 60's was about the transformation of the democratic party. i contended that comparing the originators (in 1866) to modern day democrats was kind of silly.

i stand by it.

i don't think you, i or brad said anything "untrue" perhaps just on differnt pages there....

oh well.
2 Pages1 2